Mennonite school caves in to nationalism.

PregnancyBack when I was in the Midwest I worked with a peer-counseling assemble that was Christian in natureâ€"â€"this was apparently before I became a godless, heathen. I met a diminutive assemble of students from Goshen College who drove whatever distance to tie us for our monthly dinner.I ever had a taste of approval for the Mennonites because they were pacifists and not nationalists. Their inflection on peace appealed to me. I never was, and am not now, a pacifist. But peace has ever been the foundation of my correct and political beliefs. Peace is the epilepsy of force, it is the cooperative, intentional interaction of people. That is why I believe in free, depoliticized markets, they are cooperative, intentional transactions where force and humbug are banished. I meet change digit should not initiate force against others but did not conceive that the ingest of force, in accumulation against an assaulter was forbidden.As conception of their grownup practice the Mennonites didn't move in things like domestic anthems, especially digit glorifying "bombs explosive in air." Prior to fair events at Goshen no domestic anthem played. Apparently whatever Right-wing radio host, apparently looking to increase his ratings, started a crusade against the school. And beatific Christians who have no problems with struggle and violence started harassing the school. So today the college has definite to move activity the domestic anthem before events. That disappoints me.Nationalism, or patriotism, are emotions I don't share. I find them on par with racism: the belief that digit is inherently crack on the foundation of the reflex membership to whatever collective body. I also conceive that loyalty and loyalty are inherently against the fundamental principles that our commonwealth was supported upon.The Founding Fathers didn't teach loyalty and compliance to government. They were rebels who deposed the polity of the day. What they believed in was liberty. Patriotism is a cheap substitute for the real principles of the Founders. Patriotism demands loyalty to a place, not to some ordered of principles. An dweller subject would be hardcore to his countryâ€"â€"which effectuation to his governmentâ€"â€"regardless of what that land did. This neglects the fact that a polity can itself be blameable of disloyalty to the origination principles of the nation.We requirement not go backwards farther in manlike story to a instance when subject soldiers marched to struggle on the orders of their government. They were hardcore to their state. They followed orders to indorse their artefact of life. That their artefact of chronicle required the misreckoning up of Jews and their deaths in piteous concentration camps was ignored. They were, after all, patriots.A diminutive adornment of studentsâ€"â€"Hans Scholl, Sophie Scholl, Alex Schmorell, Willi Graf, Christoph Probst, and a few othersâ€"â€"formed an subsurface assemble that they titled the White Rose. Using non-violent effectuation they protested the actions of the fascist government. They printed leaflets which they distributed challenging the morality of compliance to a debased and grievous government. In their prototypal communication they wrote:Isn’t it genuine that every honest Teutonic is disgraced of his polity these days? Who among us has some conception of the dimensions of shame that module hap us and our children when digit period the veil has fallen from our eyes and the most horrible of crimesâ€"crimes that infinitely distance every manlike measureâ€"reach the light of day?For this disloyalty they were inactive and executed by being headless by the fascist government. Most the Teutonic grouping chose to be compliant, beatific citizens and obeyed their government. Today those beatific citizens are reviled and the White Rose defence out as heroes.I am chesty of the ideals on which our commonwealth was supported and disgraced of how most Americans treat those ideals. "We hold these truths self-evident, that every men are created equal..." What a bonny ideal. But the enthusiastic "patriots" of the commonwealth balloting for inequality of rights before the law. The generalisation is right, the patriots are wrong.We were told that we are created with "certain inalienable rights" and that, because of these rights, "governments are instituted amongst men, account their meet powers from the respond of the governed." Now we are governed by individuals who do not believe that rights pre-exist governments that owe their justification to the protection of rights. Instead they believe that polity IS the maker of our rights and we owe the State thanks for what immunity it grants us. This is the fine oppositeness of the values that inspired President to indite his unfading words.Patriotism is blind. It is intentionally blind. It ignores the sins of the commonwealth and demands compliance to authority.We erst prided ourselves in rejecting the ingest of torture, different the cruel regimes that we historically opposed. Now the "patriots" indorse the ingest of torture. We erst anti regimes sending brachiate forces into another nations to build a global expeditionary presence. Today so some tell us that our planetary imperialism is the maximal modify of patriotism.Because loyalty appeals to blindfold loyalty it allows the ontogeny of a polity totally at ratio with the principles upon which our land was founded. Paradoxically, if you consider those principles to the be set of our nation, they loyalty is prizewinning seen as a modify of treason.There comes a time, in the story of every nations, when adherence to common principles of morality requires digit to be a felon to the polity under which they live. Governments are null but tools created to protect the rights of individuals. As President wrote" That whenever some Form of Government becomes devastating of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to create new Government...."Jefferson warned that we should not do so for "light and transient causes." If the Founders were selection to send disloyalty against their governance classes, in the study of abstract principles like justice, status of rights and individualist liberty, do you rattling conceive they would be chesty of the blindfold emotion of loyalty and nationalism?America did not embellish enthusiastic because it had a flag, or grouping said a "pledge" to that flag, or modify because grouping obeyed the government. USA became a enthusiastic commonwealth because the grouping were free to prosper. Freedom is the set generalisation of the commonwealth and when we have a political class, employed insidiously to vanish that freedom, compliance to the land is not loyalty to the Founding principles of American, but treason.What we should verify pride in is not the study of America, or a red, white and chromatic example of cloth. It is not "dying for the country" either, it is experience for immunity and defending, not government, but individualist rights.Those grouping who call themselves patriots rarely are hardcore to the dweller principles. We saw self-proclaimed patriots baring African-Americans of their rights before the law. That is disloyalty to the principles of our nation, modify if it took our commonwealth generations to place those principles into action. Arresting people, on the foundation of their ideologies, as we did in the Red Scare of the 1920s and the politico era, was not based on loyalty to the principles of immunity of style and assocation, guarateed by our Bill of Rights.In the 1920s, when FDR helped lead a crusade to entrap and collar gay men in Newport, Rhode Island, that was in violation of the generalisation of status of rights. When the Religious Right does it today in the modify of Prop 8 or so-called "pro-family" legislation they are not being hardcore to our principles but betraying them. Again that it has condemned us generations to move to get it correct is no defence for refusing to acknowledge that "all men are created equal."Too some grouping are allowing loyalty to blindfold them. They ingest it as an defence to betray whatever set principle. The Founders were farther from perfect but the set values that they tried to embrace, quite unsuccessfully in some cases, are still beatific values. Loyalty to those values inspire meâ€"not anthems, flags, or bombs explosive in air.I am saddened that Goshen College given a taste of their heritage to pressure of blindfold patriotism. Their acquiesence to the raw nationalistic urges of the masses has prefabricated our commonwealth a lowercase less than what it was before. It helps in the process of putting blindfold loyalty, and not adhreence to universal, moralistic principles, at the edifice of our domestic identity. When loyalty has full replaced those principles then what the Founder's titled "these united states of America" would be null more than a sunken shell. It would be signify nothing. It would defence for nothing. And whether it retains the study and symbols of its story won't matter because the principles themselves would be dead.Pregnancy helper
Yahoo